Skip to main content

ACS LIES ABOUT FOSTER CARE- SCATHING ARTICLE BY RICHARD WEXLER

Opinion: City is Spinning Child-Welfare Stats

PRINTMORE
NYC MMR
Were there a hotline to which one could report statistics abuse, the leaders of  New York City’s Administration for Children’s Services would have their rights to their spreadsheet software terminated.
ACS Commissioner David Hansell’s recent column for City Limits is only the latest example.  The agency regularly cherry-picks data to disguise the fact that, under Hansell’s leadership, ACS has retreated from reform and subjected more children to the enormous trauma of needless foster care.
Consider the matter of time frames.  When it suites him, Hansell is willing to go back decades, in effect taking credit for the accomplishments of others in reducing the number of children in foster care on any given day.
But when it comes to the number of children torn from their families in the most traumatic way possible – so-called emergency removals — he tells us only that “in 2018, the number of emergency removals declined 14 percent from 2017.”
The commissioner is evidently referring to calendar years. What he does not tell us is that in Fiscal Year 2017—which ran from July 2016 through June 30, 2017—the number of such removals skyrocketed by nearly 30 percent over the same period in 2016 – and stayed at that high rate in Fiscal Year 2018. So if, in fact, such removals have now declined, it must have happened in the second half of calendar 2018, after the 2018 fiscal year was over.  (Unfortunately, Hansell provides no sources or links for his claims.)
But even if his calendar year figure is accurate, Hansell’s bragging is like a bank robber who says, “Well, yes, two years ago I robbed that bank, but last year I gave almost half the money back!”
Hansell also wants us to believe that ACS resorts to “emergency” removal only in the most serious cases.  Yet in 20 to 25 percent of such removals, as soon as ACS has to make a case in court, the judge throws it out and sends the child home.  Consider the implications:  The very fact that ACS already has taken the child stacks the deck.  ACS has had at least 24 hours to build a case.  The judge need find only that it’s slightly more likely than not that abuse or neglect occurred to hold the child in foster care.  And the judge knows s/he will be all over the New York Post front page if s/he sends the child home and something goes wrong.
In spite of all that, judges still send the children home in hundreds of “emergencies” that really aren’t.   To hear what a typical so-called emergency is like, listen to this edition of NPR’s Latino USA, starting at 17:05 in.
As for the pious proclamations about removing children in emergencies to keep them safe, that ignores the multiple studies finding high rates of abuse in foster care itself. It also ignores the enormous psychic trauma – the same sort of trauma endured by children taken needlessly at the Mexican border.
Worse, these kinds of removals often are the ones for which it is likely to be hardest to find a placement right away. So these children are among those most likely to wind up warehoused at the Nicholas Scoppetta Children’s Center – which NBC New York just exposed as rife with abuse – in part due to overcrowding.
Hansell plays the same “I gave back some of the money I robbed” game with cases in which ACS hauls a family into court to try to place it under “supervision.”  He writes that in 2018, the number of such cases  “decreased by 20 percent from 2017.”  Perhaps.  But in Fiscal Year 2017 such cases skyrocketed by 50 percent over the same period in 2016 – and again, the number stayed just as high in Fiscal Year 2018. So again, even if there was a decrease toward the end of 2018 – and page 8 of this document from ACS suggests there was, it still means the number of families forced to jump through court-ordered hoops has soared since Hansell began running ACS.
Such supervision isn’t nearly as benign as Hansell portrays it.  Shakira Kennedy was placed on court supervision for using marijuana – the only way she could keep food down during her pregnancy with twins.  No, the children weren’t taken – but, as she explained in this Daily News op-ed, their lives still were made far worse by the “supervision.”
This isn’t the first time Hansell’s ACS has provided data that are, at best, incomplete.  The increase in emergency removals was one result of a foster-care panic, a sharp, sudden increase in children torn from their homes after a high-profile child abuse fatality – in this case the death of Zymere Perkins in September, 2016.
Speaking on WNYC’s Brian Lehrer Show on Aug. 11, 2017, Hansell denied there had been any overall increase in removals at all.  That wasn’t true. Then ACS admitted that, yes, there was an increase, but only at the same rate as the increase in reports alleging child abuse.  That wasn’t true either.  As the Mayor’s Management Report shows,removals increased at a higher rate.
Every chance he gets, large and small, Hansell tries to spin the data.  So he tells us that “in 2018, removals happened in 2,060 investigations.”  Unless you read it carefully, that sounds like 2,060 children were removed from their homes.  In fact, in CFY 2018 the number of children removed  was 4,000.
So there is some poetic justice in the fact that one of the cases of neglect at the Children’s Center was so horrible, and ACS failed to respond for so long, that a family court judge finally held Hansell in contempt.  That’s only fair.  ACS’ penchant for spinning data reveals that the agency has been treating us with contempt for years.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

HOW TO FILE A COMPLAINT AGAINST ACS

We are often asked by parents; how do I file a complaint against the abusive ACS worker. The first thing we advise is not to file an complaints with anyone at ACS. ACS supervisors are there to protect their paychecks and their jobs. They will usually stone wall the parent into giving up. The goal of the ACS supervisors is to ensure that the parents follow the demands of ACS. Also, we do not suggest filing a complaint with any local political office. ACS is so dysfunctional that they are immune to any political pressure of any kind. Mayor Deblasio has failed to correct the problems at ACS and the agency is simply on cruise control with no one in control. The most effective way to file a complaint against an ACS worker is to file suit in federal court. This will get the workers attention and take them out of their comfort zone. We urge parents to obtain an attorney as fast as possible and begin the process of a lawsuit. The federal courts are a neutral place for parents to bring

THE ACS DRUG TEST GAME

As we have discussed, anyone with a phone can call ACS on anyone else. ACS does not investigate who calls. they simply go and attack the parent. One of the most common calls to ACS is that a parent is using "drugs". The ACS worker will then go to the home and demand that the parent take a drug test. This is a trap. The way ACS uses drug tests is as follows. If they are positive, even for marijuana, they will demand that the parent enter into a drug program. If they are negative, they will hide the results and harass the parent until the parent enters a drug program. For ACS , the accusation is the proof of the case. The ACS workers are very poorly trained, badly educated, and extremely arrogant. It is very difficult for parents to deal with them because they are so unprofessional and the parents are not prepared for this. Many ACS workers we have spoke to will not even give us their business cards or full names. In fact, letters that parents receive from ACS only have the wor

THE STEPS OF AN ACS CASE

 In this post we will discuss in depth all of the steps of an ACS case. 1. INVESTIGATION - The case starts with a call being made to ACS or the child abuse hotline that a child is being abused or neglected. It is important to remember that anyone can call on anyone for anything. This will result in an ACS worker coming to your doorstep. This may happen at any time of the day or night. Once they arrive ACS workers look for any reason to create a case against the parents. Even if the case is baseless, the ACS worker will dig into your family until they find something they feel they can use to file charges against your family. This investigation can go on for months. DO NOT SPEAK TO ACS WORKERS WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY. 2. CHILD SAFETY CONFERENCE: This is the legal equivalent of being attacked by a gang The parents are ordered to come to an ACS office where they will be facing ACS workers and supervisors. The ACS workers will be attacking them and not listening to anything that the parents ma