In a recent case, the parents obtained medical care for their child and ACS was involved. The ACS worker assured the parents that this case was of no concern. Then the parents received a letter in the mail saying they were indicated for child abuse. When the parents tried to obtain an explanation from ACS, the ACS worker would not return their calls. This is a classic ACS case. They assure the parents that nothing is wrong and then hit them with a indication. What this means is now the parents will have to file for a hearing if they want to be removed from the indicated list. This is simply a way to attack parents without any actual proof.Brooklynacslawyer.com
Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department AD3d Argued - May 17, 2022 FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P. JOSEPH J. MALTESE PAUL WOOTEN LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ. 2021-07543 DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of Lexis B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Joseph B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. N-1916-21, N-1917-21) Michael S. Discioarro, New York, NY, for appellant. Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Andrea Nishi of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Anne M. Serby, Long Beach, NY, attorney for the child Lexis B. In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County ...
Comments
Post a Comment