NEW YORK CITY ACS DEFENSE LAWYER

ACS workers will use an old tactic against parents that has been used in many different fields. The "my supervisors" said he wants this. This is used against parents to take the blame off the ACS worker and put it on an amorphous supervisor who is in the background controlling events. The is simply a ruse and should not be followed. The acs agenda is two fold. One, if possible it is to remove children and place them in foster care and if that is not legally possible, ACS wants parents to take useless services. The ACS commissioner recently said to the city council that parents should not have lawyers because they may mis out on "all that ACS has to offer". Be mindful this is a highly dysfunctional agency that attacks thousands of parents each year. They do this to ensure that their $3.1 billion budget keeps increasing. If you have been contacted by ACS, contact us at 917-519-8417 and stand up for your family. FALSEACSCHARGES.COM BROOKLYNACSLAWYER.COM

Parents are often shocked to hear that an ACS worker went to their child's school, pulled them out of class and interviewed them without the parents consent. This is an every day tactic that ACS workers employ. Even after they have visited the home, the ACS workers will go to the school in hopes of having the children make statements that they can use against the parents. The goal of the ACS worker is to manufacture as much damaging information against the parents in order to force the parents to enter useless ACS programs. Thus ensuring that ACS keeps being funded. If you have been contacted by an ACS worker, contact us at THE LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL DISCIOARRO, LLC AT 917-519-8417. FIGHTSACS.COM BROOKLYNACSLAWYER.COM

NYC ACS Lawyer Announces Return of Child in 1028 Hearing ACS took our clients child away from the hospital upon her birth. After weeks of testimony and outright fabrications from the ACS worker, the child was reunited with her mother. NEW YORK  -  June 3, 2019  -  PRLog  -- The case against N.P was particularly sad. The parents had been ambushed by an ACS worker at the hospital. ACS workers like to attack parents in the hospital after they have given birth because they are in a weakened state and cannot defend themselves. The ACS worker removed the child from the parents custody and would not let child leave the hospital. This is the power that ACS has. The Law Offices of Michael S. Discioarro, LLC filed a demand from a return of the child. This is known as a 1028 hearing. The hearing began and what followed was weeks of testimony before the Hon. Frias-Colon. ACS was adamant about the child not returning to the mother despite there being no imminent risk ...

THE New York TIMES RAN THE FOLLOWING STORY TODAY ON THE DANGERS OF BEING INDICATED FOR CHILD ABUSE. GO TO THIS LINK. FIGHTACS.CO M BROOKLYNACSLAWYER.COM ADVERTISEMENT The issue has become especially urgent as more people apply to become home health aides, one of the fastest growing industries in the country. In New York, agencies that work with children or vulnerable adults are required to screen job applicants through the registry. Last year, the state processed more than 316,000 of those background checks. Parents and their advocates are pushing elected officials to consider reducing the amount of time a name lingers on the register to five years, with some exceptions. You have  1 free article  remaining. Subscribe to The Times Registers were created decades ago to address the kind of recurrent abuse that can fall through the cracks, often revealed when a child is killed. A previous report of abuse is the strongest predictor of...

YOU CAN'T HAVE A LAWYER IN THIS CASE  ACS workers who visit parents at the home will often advise parents that they are not allowed a lawyer because the case is not in court. They may also use language like "you don''t need a lawyer". This is simply untrue. The right to counsel in New York is heavily protected by the courts. ACS workers despise dealing with attorneys and in fact ACS policy is that ACS workers do not speak to attorneys. ACS workers will only speak to parents. What is the reason for this policy? Government agents of all types speak to attorneys on a regular basis to resolve cases. ACS workers are very poorly trained and the vast majority have not been on the job very long. Turnover at ACS is rampant and many people quit after realizing the true dysfunction of the agency. BROOKLYNACSLAWYER.COM NYCACSLAWYER.COM FIGHTACS.COM

ACS workers have two agendas. First, if they can, they want remove children from parents and place them in foster care. Second, if that cannot be accomplished, they want parents to use ACS "services". The reason is simple. ACS funding depends on how many children are in foster care and how many parents use their services. In this series we will discuss the top ACS lies, and examine them one lie at a time. - THE INVESTIGATION WILL ONLY LAST 60 DAYS. This is the top ACS lie. Once a parent hears that the investigation is only for 60 days, they see a light at the end of the tunnel. The truth is that the investigation will last as long as ACS says it does. The ACS worker will often come back to the parents saying that their "supervisor" wants the parents to do certain services. This is not on an order from a judge it is simply at the whim of the ACS worker. NYCACSLAWYER.COM FIGHTACS.COM BROOKLYNACSLAWYER.COM Staten Island ACS LAWYER

Last winter, Governor Andrew Cuomo engaged Kroll Associates—a premier white-collar investigative firm, renowned for high-stakes snooping in the corporate world—to suggest how to fix the city’s broken child-welfare system. The consultants produced a 31-page report of practical recommendations, including hiring more caseworkers to reduce caseloads, hiring investigators with law-enforcement backgrounds to perform criminal background checks on parents, and increasing the number of ACS staff authorized to see these criminal-history records. Kroll suggested that investigators with law-enforcement backgrounds accompany caseworkers to at-risk homes, and recommended better coordination between the ACS and the Department of Education, as well as other agencies. The consultants also urged the ACS to reduce the “response time” of caseworkers when learning of imminent danger in the home.

Mom charged in baby’s death had already lost custody of 3 kids By  Rich Calder ,  Reuven Fenton  and  Tina Moore June 13, 2018  |  5:47pm  |   Updated  Modal Trigger Joann McLeod Wayne Carrington A K2-addict Bronx mom with a history of having her kids taken away by ACS was allowed to keep her baby despite claims of drug use and neglect in her squalid home —  and two weeks later, she allegedly killed him , sources told The Post on Wednesday. Administration for Children’s Services workers visited Joann McLeod’s apartment in the Bronx River Houses on May 20 based on a complaint, but decided that 5-month-old Raymond Porfil Jr. was not in danger, the sources said. SEE ALSO Mom arrested after baby dies from 'extreme abuse and neglect': cops On June 4, McLeod allegedly threw him against a wall and then put him in his crib rather than seek medical help because she feared she would go to jail, authorities...

FIGHTACS.COM

Every day, ACS workers go to the NYPD and demand help in accomplishing their work. Usually this involves going to a parents home and by force, remove the children. This is the very last thing that a New York City Police Officer signed up for. They NYPD is fully aware how dysfunctional ACS is and they would rather not deal with ACS workers. However, they are mandate to by their commanders. NYPD detectives also don't like to work with ACS workers because of the sloppiness and baseless of cases that they bring. ACS workers will also involve the NYPD in lawsuits because of the cases that they chose to take to court.  The rank and file police officers do not want to knock on a parents door and remove a child from their custody. The removal of a child from the home is traumatic and can scar a child for life. This has no bearing on ACS workers. To them, its another child they can throw into the foster care system and obtain tens of thousands of dollars a year for funding. QUEENSACSLAW...

This is one of the favorite tactics of an ACS worker. They will claim that they received a call that the parent uses drugs around the children. It does not matter to the ACS worker who made the call. The ACS worker will then demand that the parent take a drug test. The ACS game is that if the parent comes back negative, they will demand other things from the parent and if the parent comes back positive they will attack them for the results. It is imperative that the parent obtain an attorney as soon as ACS demands a drug test. Saying no may open the door for ACS to remove the child. An attorney will quickly fight back and hold ACS to its legal obligations. It is very important not to speak to the ACS worker at all. They will often manufacture a lie and claim you have made managing statements. NYCACSLAWYER.COM

We are often asked, how does ACS physically take the parents out of the parents home. The first and most blunt way is that the ACS worker will show up with police officers and physically remove the children and take them away. This of course is devastating tot the parents and causes children to be traumatized. ACS does nothing to try to help the children cope with this situation and callously transport the children to a processing center where they languish for days until a home can be found. The most common way that ACS removes kids is by tricking the parents to come to a meeting at the ACS office. The ACS worker and her supervisors will concoct some story about how they need to see the children. Once the children arrive they are separated from their parents and taken into foster care. Another way, is the ACS workers and the police will go and pick up the children at school,WITHOUT WARNING the parents. This may be the most devastating of all because the parents are called at work ...

Lawyers for Child Welfare and Legal Aid Under Scrutiny for Facebook Posts By  NIKITA STEWART AUG. 30, 2017 Continue reading the main story Share This Page Share Tweet Email More Save 2 Photo David Hansell, left, the commissioner of New York City’s Administration for Children’s Services, said he was “appalled” at the social media posts that mocked people in Family Court. Credit Todd Heisler/The New York Times  The Facebook posts were crass and left no doubt the authors did not approve of the attire that some people wore to Family Court in Queens. “Bra tops n butt cheeks! Somebody come look at this!!” the caption read above a photo of a young woman in a pink short set that had pink sheer draping on either side as i f to make a skirt. “From the back! I took it for you!” read the caption of another photo of the same woman that was taken from behind. A grateful commenter responded, “Good work!!!!” The disparaging banter was the kind of back-a...