Skip to main content

CLIENT'S CHILD RETURNED AFTER 1028 HEARING

NYC ACS Lawyer Announces Return of Child in 1028 Hearing

ACS took our clients child away from the hospital upon her birth. After weeks of testimony and outright fabrications from the ACS worker, the child was reunited with her mother.
NEW YORK - June 3, 2019 - PRLog -- The case against N.P was particularly sad. The parents had been ambushed by an ACS worker at the hospital. ACS workers like to attack parents in the hospital after they have given birth because they are in a weakened state and cannot defend themselves. The ACS worker removed the child from the parents custody and would not let child leave the hospital. This is the power that ACS has.

The Law Offices of Michael S. Discioarro, LLC filed a demand from a return of the child. This is known as a 1028 hearing. The hearing began and what followed was weeks of testimony before the Hon. Frias-Colon. ACS was adamant about the child not returning to the mother despite there being no imminent risk to the child. "ACS likes to keep children in foster care as long as they can. The children in foster care are worth a lot of money to ACS and they simply cannot give up that revenue stream." Mr. Discioarro said.

Ultimately, after attacking ACS's unreasonable position, ACS agreed to return the child to the mother." Our client is very happy. the ACS worker was very abusive in how she treated our client and would hide anything positive about our client." Mr. Discioarro said.

ACS workers are hardly trained in any way, yet judges allow them to testify as if they are experts in everything regarding childcare. ACS was represented by Alexandria Guglielmo and the ACS worker was Ana Palumbaj.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

APPEALS COURT SLAMS FAMILY COURT JUDGE AND ACS!!

  Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department AD3d Argued - May 17, 2022 FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P. JOSEPH J. MALTESE PAUL WOOTEN LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ. 2021-07543 DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of Lexis B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Joseph B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. N-1916-21, N-1917-21) Michael S. Discioarro, New York, NY, for appellant. Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Andrea Nishi of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Anne M. Serby, Long Beach, NY, attorney for the child Lexis B. In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County ...

THE DANGER OF THE ACS HOME VISITS

 The bulk of the street level work that ACS does is the home visit. ACS workers take this opportunity to attack the parents in any ay that they can. Initially the ACS worker will demand that the parents not record them. They will actually give you orders in your own home. Do not allow them to do this. If you have been contacted by ACS, contact our hotline at      917-519-8417 Do not speak to an acs worker without an attorney!! brooklynacslawyer.com queensacslawyer.com bronxacslawyer.com statenislandacslawyer.com sueacs.com

SUE ACS

  ACS Lawyer Announces Lawsuit Against ACS On Behalf of Innocent Mother The Law Offices of Michael S. Discioarro, LLC Announced Today A Lawsuit Filed Against ACS by The Firm On Behalf Of An Innocent Mother. By: LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL DISCIOARRO BRONX, N.Y.  -  June 8, 2022  -  PRLog  -- "These facts are so outrageous they need to be judged by a jury." Mr. Discioarro said. In  new lawsuit in the case of  X.J v ACS ,  ACS  filed a petition of neglect against and innocent mother, removed her child who had special needs, only to dismiss the case three days after it was filed. "this is an incredible abuse of power, the worst I have seen in a while." Mr. Discioarro said. The mother was completely blindsided by the removal of the child into foster care and fought every step of the way to get the child back. ACS and other child protective agencies receive state and federal funding for each child removed. Thus, the more children they remove, the ...