Skip to main content

ACS LIES ABOUT FOSTER CARE- SCATHING ARTICLE BY RICHARD WEXLER

Opinion: City is Spinning Child-Welfare Stats

PRINTMORE
NYC MMR
Were there a hotline to which one could report statistics abuse, the leaders of  New York City’s Administration for Children’s Services would have their rights to their spreadsheet software terminated.
ACS Commissioner David Hansell’s recent column for City Limits is only the latest example.  The agency regularly cherry-picks data to disguise the fact that, under Hansell’s leadership, ACS has retreated from reform and subjected more children to the enormous trauma of needless foster care.
Consider the matter of time frames.  When it suites him, Hansell is willing to go back decades, in effect taking credit for the accomplishments of others in reducing the number of children in foster care on any given day.
But when it comes to the number of children torn from their families in the most traumatic way possible – so-called emergency removals — he tells us only that “in 2018, the number of emergency removals declined 14 percent from 2017.”
The commissioner is evidently referring to calendar years. What he does not tell us is that in Fiscal Year 2017—which ran from July 2016 through June 30, 2017—the number of such removals skyrocketed by nearly 30 percent over the same period in 2016 – and stayed at that high rate in Fiscal Year 2018. So if, in fact, such removals have now declined, it must have happened in the second half of calendar 2018, after the 2018 fiscal year was over.  (Unfortunately, Hansell provides no sources or links for his claims.)
But even if his calendar year figure is accurate, Hansell’s bragging is like a bank robber who says, “Well, yes, two years ago I robbed that bank, but last year I gave almost half the money back!”
Hansell also wants us to believe that ACS resorts to “emergency” removal only in the most serious cases.  Yet in 20 to 25 percent of such removals, as soon as ACS has to make a case in court, the judge throws it out and sends the child home.  Consider the implications:  The very fact that ACS already has taken the child stacks the deck.  ACS has had at least 24 hours to build a case.  The judge need find only that it’s slightly more likely than not that abuse or neglect occurred to hold the child in foster care.  And the judge knows s/he will be all over the New York Post front page if s/he sends the child home and something goes wrong.
In spite of all that, judges still send the children home in hundreds of “emergencies” that really aren’t.   To hear what a typical so-called emergency is like, listen to this edition of NPR’s Latino USA, starting at 17:05 in.
As for the pious proclamations about removing children in emergencies to keep them safe, that ignores the multiple studies finding high rates of abuse in foster care itself. It also ignores the enormous psychic trauma – the same sort of trauma endured by children taken needlessly at the Mexican border.
Worse, these kinds of removals often are the ones for which it is likely to be hardest to find a placement right away. So these children are among those most likely to wind up warehoused at the Nicholas Scoppetta Children’s Center – which NBC New York just exposed as rife with abuse – in part due to overcrowding.
Hansell plays the same “I gave back some of the money I robbed” game with cases in which ACS hauls a family into court to try to place it under “supervision.”  He writes that in 2018, the number of such cases  “decreased by 20 percent from 2017.”  Perhaps.  But in Fiscal Year 2017 such cases skyrocketed by 50 percent over the same period in 2016 – and again, the number stayed just as high in Fiscal Year 2018. So again, even if there was a decrease toward the end of 2018 – and page 8 of this document from ACS suggests there was, it still means the number of families forced to jump through court-ordered hoops has soared since Hansell began running ACS.
Such supervision isn’t nearly as benign as Hansell portrays it.  Shakira Kennedy was placed on court supervision for using marijuana – the only way she could keep food down during her pregnancy with twins.  No, the children weren’t taken – but, as she explained in this Daily News op-ed, their lives still were made far worse by the “supervision.”
This isn’t the first time Hansell’s ACS has provided data that are, at best, incomplete.  The increase in emergency removals was one result of a foster-care panic, a sharp, sudden increase in children torn from their homes after a high-profile child abuse fatality – in this case the death of Zymere Perkins in September, 2016.
Speaking on WNYC’s Brian Lehrer Show on Aug. 11, 2017, Hansell denied there had been any overall increase in removals at all.  That wasn’t true. Then ACS admitted that, yes, there was an increase, but only at the same rate as the increase in reports alleging child abuse.  That wasn’t true either.  As the Mayor’s Management Report shows,removals increased at a higher rate.
Every chance he gets, large and small, Hansell tries to spin the data.  So he tells us that “in 2018, removals happened in 2,060 investigations.”  Unless you read it carefully, that sounds like 2,060 children were removed from their homes.  In fact, in CFY 2018 the number of children removed  was 4,000.
So there is some poetic justice in the fact that one of the cases of neglect at the Children’s Center was so horrible, and ACS failed to respond for so long, that a family court judge finally held Hansell in contempt.  That’s only fair.  ACS’ penchant for spinning data reveals that the agency has been treating us with contempt for years.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

APPEALS COURT SLAMS FAMILY COURT JUDGE AND ACS!!

  Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department AD3d Argued - May 17, 2022 FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P. JOSEPH J. MALTESE PAUL WOOTEN LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ. 2021-07543 DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of Lexis B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Joseph B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. N-1916-21, N-1917-21) Michael S. Discioarro, New York, NY, for appellant. Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Andrea Nishi of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Anne M. Serby, Long Beach, NY, attorney for the child Lexis B. In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County ...

THE DANGER OF THE ACS HOME VISITS

 The bulk of the street level work that ACS does is the home visit. ACS workers take this opportunity to attack the parents in any ay that they can. Initially the ACS worker will demand that the parents not record them. They will actually give you orders in your own home. Do not allow them to do this. If you have been contacted by ACS, contact our hotline at      917-519-8417 Do not speak to an acs worker without an attorney!! brooklynacslawyer.com queensacslawyer.com bronxacslawyer.com statenislandacslawyer.com sueacs.com

SUE ACS

  ACS Lawyer Announces Lawsuit Against ACS On Behalf of Innocent Mother The Law Offices of Michael S. Discioarro, LLC Announced Today A Lawsuit Filed Against ACS by The Firm On Behalf Of An Innocent Mother. By: LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL DISCIOARRO BRONX, N.Y.  -  June 8, 2022  -  PRLog  -- "These facts are so outrageous they need to be judged by a jury." Mr. Discioarro said. In  new lawsuit in the case of  X.J v ACS ,  ACS  filed a petition of neglect against and innocent mother, removed her child who had special needs, only to dismiss the case three days after it was filed. "this is an incredible abuse of power, the worst I have seen in a while." Mr. Discioarro said. The mother was completely blindsided by the removal of the child into foster care and fought every step of the way to get the child back. ACS and other child protective agencies receive state and federal funding for each child removed. Thus, the more children they remove, the ...