The matter of H.H. in Queens Family Court involved a four year old boy that was taken into foster care by ACS, without justification. It was time to demand the return of the child to our client. The vehicle for this is a 1028 hearing. The judge must decide wether the parent is an imminent risk to the child. On the day of the hearing ACS, not being able to produce a shred of evidence against our client, backed down and returned the child to our client. This was a joyous occasion for all and child and mother are doing wonderful despite what ACS has put them through. If ACS has targeted your family, call our hotline at 917-519-8417 and let us fight for you.
Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department AD3d Argued - May 17, 2022 FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P. JOSEPH J. MALTESE PAUL WOOTEN LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ. 2021-07543 DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of Lexis B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Joseph B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. N-1916-21, N-1917-21) Michael S. Discioarro, New York, NY, for appellant. Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Andrea Nishi of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Anne M. Serby, Long Beach, NY, attorney for the child Lexis B. In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County ...
Comments
Post a Comment