Skip to main content

BROOKLYN FAMILY COURT JUDGE SLAMS ACS WORKER CRYSTAL MARTINEZ, CLIENT WINS 1028 HEARING

 ACS in Brooklyn filed a petition against the father in acs of Matter of K.N in file number 02044-21. ACS demanded that the father be excluded from the home and not be allowed to live with his family. After a 1028 hearing, the Hon. J. Ben Darvil, of Brooklyn Family Court decided otherwise. The Court found that the ACS worker, Crystal Martinez's testimony was "remarkable in that she chose to answer her questions and not the ones posed by counsel." The Court found no imminent risk and ordered the father be allowed back into the family home.


"We are pleased that the Court saw through the testimony of the ACS worker and allowed our client back home to his family where he belongs," Mr. Discioarro said. ACS routinely excludes parents from the home in an effort to force parents into services and make them comply with ACS demands. The family in this case was grateful that the Court allowed the father back home and was not swayed by fraudulent ACS testimony. ACS attorney Edward Sinitsas represented ACS at the hearing.

If you or your family has been targeted by ACS, contact The Law Offices of Michael S. Discioarro, LLC at 917-519-8417.

FIGHTACS.COM

BROOKLYNACSLAWYER.COM

BRONXACSLAWYER.COM

MANHATTANACSLAWYER.COM

STATENISLANDACSLAWYER.COM
End
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

APPEALS COURT SLAMS FAMILY COURT JUDGE AND ACS!!

  Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department AD3d Argued - May 17, 2022 FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P. JOSEPH J. MALTESE PAUL WOOTEN LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ. 2021-07543 DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of Lexis B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Joseph B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. N-1916-21, N-1917-21) Michael S. Discioarro, New York, NY, for appellant. Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Andrea Nishi of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Anne M. Serby, Long Beach, NY, attorney for the child Lexis B. In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County ...
Post a Comment
Read more

THE DANGER OF THE ACS HOME VISITS

 The bulk of the street level work that ACS does is the home visit. ACS workers take this opportunity to attack the parents in any ay that they can. Initially the ACS worker will demand that the parents not record them. They will actually give you orders in your own home. Do not allow them to do this. If you have been contacted by ACS, contact our hotline at      917-519-8417 Do not speak to an acs worker without an attorney!! brooklynacslawyer.com queensacslawyer.com bronxacslawyer.com statenislandacslawyer.com sueacs.com
Post a Comment
Read more

SUE ACS

  ACS Lawyer Announces Lawsuit Against ACS On Behalf of Innocent Mother The Law Offices of Michael S. Discioarro, LLC Announced Today A Lawsuit Filed Against ACS by The Firm On Behalf Of An Innocent Mother. By: LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL DISCIOARRO BRONX, N.Y.  -  June 8, 2022  -  PRLog  -- "These facts are so outrageous they need to be judged by a jury." Mr. Discioarro said. In  new lawsuit in the case of  X.J v ACS ,  ACS  filed a petition of neglect against and innocent mother, removed her child who had special needs, only to dismiss the case three days after it was filed. "this is an incredible abuse of power, the worst I have seen in a while." Mr. Discioarro said. The mother was completely blindsided by the removal of the child into foster care and fought every step of the way to get the child back. ACS and other child protective agencies receive state and federal funding for each child removed. Thus, the more children they remove, the ...
Post a Comment
Read more