Our office receives countless calls by parents who want to file a complaint about the ACS worker investigating their case. They often turn to a complaint line that ACS has set up. This is a mere shell game. The ACS supervisors simply take the call if they answer at all and defend the actions of the ACS worker. This allows the ACS worker to continue to manufacture a case against the parents. ACS supervisors do not respond to parents and they do not fear being fired because the agency is so mismanaged they will retain anyone regardless of performance. Suing ACS is federal court is the best path to attack ACS. If enough parents do this, the city must take notice.
Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department AD3d Argued - May 17, 2022 FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P. JOSEPH J. MALTESE PAUL WOOTEN LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ. 2021-07543 DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of Lexis B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Joseph B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. N-1916-21, N-1917-21) Michael S. Discioarro, New York, NY, for appellant. Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Andrea Nishi of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Anne M. Serby, Long Beach, NY, attorney for the child Lexis B. In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County ...
Comments
Post a Comment