Skip to main content

THE REASON WHY ACS ATTACKS GOOD PARENTS

 We are often asked by our clients, why is ACS attacking me in this way? The answer is very simple. Because New York City has become a wealthier place in the last 20 years, many social services are simply not needed. Parents with resources are able to obtain help privately without the interference and the treat of court action. This leaves ACS is a difficult position. Like every business, they need customers to survive. The best way to do that is to attack and force services on good parents. For one simple reason. ACS knows that these parents love their children and would never harm them. Its the equivalent of the mechanic facing a car that is not broken. He can claim after the fact that he's a great mechanic. ACS forces parents into useless ACS programs and at the end of the year they write a report to the city Council outlining how many families they have "helped" and ask fro more funding. This is the political money game that ACS workers play. They are advised by their supervisors that parents MUST enter services, or else. That threat is usually veiled but often more direct." if you don't do this we will take you to court." The threat is ACS's most powerful tool. Do Not fall for this.


acsattorney.com

brooklynacslawyer.com

queensacslawyer.com

bronxacslawyer.com

statenislandacslawyer.com

Comments

  1. Awesome article with great information, thank you guys for sharing such a fantastic blog. Meanwhile check this out

    Top divorce lawyers Brooklyn

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

APPEALS COURT SLAMS FAMILY COURT JUDGE AND ACS!!

  Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department AD3d Argued - May 17, 2022 FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P. JOSEPH J. MALTESE PAUL WOOTEN LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ. 2021-07543 DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of Lexis B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Joseph B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. N-1916-21, N-1917-21) Michael S. Discioarro, New York, NY, for appellant. Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Andrea Nishi of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Anne M. Serby, Long Beach, NY, attorney for the child Lexis B. In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County ...

THE DANGER OF THE ACS HOME VISITS

 The bulk of the street level work that ACS does is the home visit. ACS workers take this opportunity to attack the parents in any ay that they can. Initially the ACS worker will demand that the parents not record them. They will actually give you orders in your own home. Do not allow them to do this. If you have been contacted by ACS, contact our hotline at      917-519-8417 Do not speak to an acs worker without an attorney!! brooklynacslawyer.com queensacslawyer.com bronxacslawyer.com statenislandacslawyer.com sueacs.com

SUE ACS

  ACS Lawyer Announces Lawsuit Against ACS On Behalf of Innocent Mother The Law Offices of Michael S. Discioarro, LLC Announced Today A Lawsuit Filed Against ACS by The Firm On Behalf Of An Innocent Mother. By: LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL DISCIOARRO BRONX, N.Y.  -  June 8, 2022  -  PRLog  -- "These facts are so outrageous they need to be judged by a jury." Mr. Discioarro said. In  new lawsuit in the case of  X.J v ACS ,  ACS  filed a petition of neglect against and innocent mother, removed her child who had special needs, only to dismiss the case three days after it was filed. "this is an incredible abuse of power, the worst I have seen in a while." Mr. Discioarro said. The mother was completely blindsided by the removal of the child into foster care and fought every step of the way to get the child back. ACS and other child protective agencies receive state and federal funding for each child removed. Thus, the more children they remove, the ...