Skip to main content

CASE AGAINST DAYCARE DISMISSED!

 he Law Offices of Michael S. Discioarro, LLC announced today the dismissal of charges against a daycare for abusing a child. The case Matter of B.C. FH#114240, the client ran a successful daycare with over one hundred happy children. A child brought an object to school and injured himself. The daycare was not aware of the object he brought in. Nevertheless, ACS and the Department of Health filed charges against the daycare.


"This was such an unfair case, my client did nothing wrong," Mr. Discioarro said. In addition to the charges, the daycare had to deal with a frivolous lawsuit from the parents.

Once charges are filed, the state has the power to shut down the daycare immediately. This can have a devastating impact on the community and the parents who run the daycare. Then the case must go before an administrative law judge and reopen the daycare. This process can take months and in the interim the daycare remains closed for families in need. If you have a daycare and are being tracked by ACS and the Health Department, contact The Law Offices of Michael S. Discioarro, LLC at 917-519-8417.

FIGHTACS.COM

BROOKLYNACSLAWYER.COM

QUEENSACSLAWYER.COM

BRONXACSLAWYER.COM

STATENISLANDACSLAWYER.COM
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW TO FILE A COMPLAINT AGAINST ACS

We are often asked by parents; how do I file a complaint against the abusive ACS worker. The first thing we advise is not to file an complaints with anyone at ACS. ACS supervisors are there to protect their paychecks and their jobs. They will usually stone wall the parent into giving up. The goal of the ACS supervisors is to ensure that the parents follow the demands of ACS. Also, we do not suggest filing a complaint with any local political office. ACS is so dysfunctional that they are immune to any political pressure of any kind. Mayor Deblasio has failed to correct the problems at ACS and the agency is simply on cruise control with no one in control. The most effective way to file a complaint against an ACS worker is to file suit in federal court. This will get the workers attention and take them out of their comfort zone. We urge parents to obtain an attorney as fast as possible and begin the process of a lawsuit. The federal courts are a neutral place for parents to bring
16 comments
Read more

THE ACS DRUG TEST GAME

As we have discussed, anyone with a phone can call ACS on anyone else. ACS does not investigate who calls. they simply go and attack the parent. One of the most common calls to ACS is that a parent is using "drugs". The ACS worker will then go to the home and demand that the parent take a drug test. This is a trap. The way ACS uses drug tests is as follows. If they are positive, even for marijuana, they will demand that the parent enter into a drug program. If they are negative, they will hide the results and harass the parent until the parent enters a drug program. For ACS , the accusation is the proof of the case. The ACS workers are very poorly trained, badly educated, and extremely arrogant. It is very difficult for parents to deal with them because they are so unprofessional and the parents are not prepared for this. Many ACS workers we have spoke to will not even give us their business cards or full names. In fact, letters that parents receive from ACS only have the wor
1 comment
Read more

APPEALS COURT SLAMS FAMILY COURT JUDGE AND ACS!!

  Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department AD3d Argued - May 17, 2022 FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P. JOSEPH J. MALTESE PAUL WOOTEN LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ. 2021-07543 DECISION & ORDER In the Matter of Lexis B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Joseph B. (Anonymous). Administration for Children’s Services, petitioner-respondent; Natalia B. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2) (Docket Nos. N-1916-21, N-1917-21) Michael S. Discioarro, New York, NY, for appellant. Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York, NY (Deborah A. Brenner and Andrea Nishi of counsel), for petitioner-respondent. Anne M. Serby, Long Beach, NY, attorney for the child Lexis B. In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Mar
Post a Comment
Read more